FLOW (For the Love Of Water) is a documentary made in 2008 concerning the global problems associated with fresh drinking water. I highly recommend this film:
August 26, 2009
The Living Building Challenge
The LBC challenge exceeds LEED platinum and begins to re-imagine how our built world can better coexist with the natural world. If everyone stepped up to the Living Building Challenge, we could make a significant impact on our society, economy, and culture. Perhaps the biggest deterrent in chasing after this goal is how meticulously detailed the prerequisites are to achieve the standard.
Responsible site selection is listed as the first prerequisite. Of course it’s important to respect our environment, and it is also important not to interfere with any naturally-occurring systems such as wetlands or prairies.
Energy is obviously an important one here, as well. All energy must come from the sun, and the building is required to be net zero energy, which means that it produces more energy than it consumes.
Material selection is also a major factor in LBC projects. There is a “red list” of materials that is supplied with the challenge, and none of the listed materials may be used in any way during the construction. These materials include CFCs, cadmium, Neoprene, HCFCs, formaldehyde, PVC, lead, mercury, pthalates, petrochemicals, and more.
Location and distance traveled of services and goods to the project must be kept to a minimum. There is a radius around the site that builders/developers are allowed to draw their resources from.
All on-site construction waste must be managed and recycled. There can be no waste produced from building a LBC certified building.
Of course, net zero water is a factor, and probably the one that most people tend to shy away from.
There are more aspects to a Living Building, but this post just serves as a general overview. If you’d like to get a more comprehensive look at the LBC challenge, you can view a pdf of the LBC in its entirety here
August 20, 2009
An Audacious Goal
Water independence is oftentimes considered one of the most stringent goals of the Living Building Challenge. Achieving Net Zero Water in a residential building may be considered extremely difficult, or somewhat impossible, especially with conflicting laws and regulations in different states. I know that this is quite a challenge, especially for a student-level project. In an attempt to thoroughly cover all aspects of this challenge, I hope to lay out a plan to accomplish this project.
In Portland, OR, a group of professionals have banded together to work on a Net Zero Water project, the Pearl Family Development. Although still conceptual, this project is well on its way to realization. A non-profit organization called Central City Concern (CCC) provides affordable housing to low-class families in Oregon. The CCC noticed rising costs of energy and water utility bills, and they set out to reduce such expenses. They joined forces with SERA Architects, Interface Engineering, and Gerding Edlen Development to achieve net-zero water in the upcoming Pearl Family Development project.
This team of organizations is trying to achieve this goal for their project, of course, but they are also selflessly transparent with the information they garner about making changes and getting this system in place. A lot of the research I’ve collected so far was informed from this team of people, as they are far ahead in achieving Net Zero Water. Since this group’s coming together, enough research was gathered to make proposals to Oregon’s governmental bodies to get regulations and laws changed, paving the way for water independence. Oregon residential and commercial buildings are now allowed to use rainwater for irrigation, toilet flushing, and clothing washing, and treated greywater is allowed to be used for flushing of toilets and urinals.
Portland is a great start, but what about the rest of the United States? What about the rest of the world? I live in Philadelphia, and I’d love to see Net Zero Water in Pennsylvania. What will it take to get PA laws changed? The Central City Concern, SERA Architects, Interface Engineering, and Gerding Edlen Development have drafted and released a “water roadmap” that explicitly lays out where each regulation or mandate comes into contact with a Net Zero Water system. This is a huge help, and they are providing a great service to other people who want to do projects similar to theirs in different states.

Source: Achieving Water Independence In Buildings via International Living Building Institute
August 18, 2009
What is Net Zero Water?
What is Net Zero Water?
Similar to Net Zero Energy, which produces energy on-site and doesn’t ever consume more than it produces, Net Zero Water is a standard that sets out to close the loop of a household’s water consumption. In order to achieve this goal, rainwater that falls on-site is collected and stored, and all wastewater produced by the building or its occupants is treated and re-used. Rainwater is the primary source of freshwater in many regions of the world and is the easiest to treat. Filtration followed by ultra violet sterilization can make rainwater potable. Greywater is wastewater produced by the bathtub/shower, washing machine, and bathroom sink. It is not potable, but it also doesn’t have all the pathogens and bacteria blackwater has. Blackwater is the murkiest of wastewater produced in homes. It comes from toilet flushes, the kitchen sink, and the garbage disposal. Blackwater is difficult to treat because it contains organic matter which must first be separated out from the wastewater.
Rainwater, greywater, and blackwater are treated differently to achieve different outcomes. For example, in order to supply potable [drinking] water to the house, rainwater or greywater must be treated thoroughly, and without the use of chemicals. In this case, rainwater is cleaner than greywater and therefore takes less energy to purify, but a household’s specific demands will determine how much water is necessary.
Why does this concept interest me?
Water is a precious resource and is absolutely vital to life. We’re not using water efficiently right now, and I don’t think it has to be that way. 80% of the wastewater we produce in our homes is greywater, while only 20% is blackwater. Instead of treating each separately, since greywater requires much less energy to treat than blackwater, we are mixing them together, which contaminates the greywater with pathogens, and we are then forced to treat everything as if it were blackwater. This inefficiency doesn’t cut it in today’s innovative and intelligent age.
Right now, potable water is used for pretty much all household demands – whether it be toilet flushes, drinking, irrigation, washing laundry, etc. This means that we’re spending a lot of extra energy treating water to a higher standard than is necessary. In places where there is no human contact, such as toilet flushes and sub-soil irrigation of non-edible crops, we do not need fresh, potable water. We can lightly treat greywater produced on site and return them back into the system for these types of uses.
What am I planning to accomplish by researching this topic?
It’d be great to see net zero water in action in Philadelphia, but I’m just curious at this point. I want to research what others are doing (such as Phipps & CCC) and get a true understanding of sustainable water use systems.
Water independence in homes would be a huge step forward in relieving the city’s treatment plants of a huge burden. Also, I think it’s important that people know where their water comes from, how it is treated, and how it can be used. That’s one thing a lot of us have lost sight of.
